RFC 2327 PDF

The Most Common Message Body. ▫ Be session information describing the media to be exchanged between the parties. ▫ SDP, RFC (initial publication). Simply the doesn’t understand this extension. A lot of SIP/WebRTC/ SDP software don’t have support for this. Instead of using the. M. Handley and V. Jacobson, “SDP: Session Description Protocol,” RFC , IETF Network Working Group, , April

Author: Kazigul Musida
Country: Honduras
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 12 November 2010
Pages: 164
PDF File Size: 17.75 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.23 Mb
ISBN: 503-6-62842-326-7
Downloads: 7539
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mazurn

Simple Authentication and Security Layer.

Comparison of SDP variants between RFC 4566 and RFC 2327

Thursday, March 01, 1: Stream Control Transmission Protocol. Reverse Address Resolution Protocol. Updated by RFC I think your text is good for a stand alone description of the problem but given that it will be integrated into the existing document I think the spirit of your proposal is covered in the existing text. Length, true But I get: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The text also 232 to ignore unknown atributes, but that assumes you’ve been able to parse the attribute name.

22327

Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. I think that’s greatly misleading, and gives the impression that there are more issues than actually exist.

Read Also:  PJESMARICA DOWNLOAD

List of RFCs – Wikipedia

Hello Colin, Thanks for the extra information. Views Read Edit View history. Without going into a case-by-case analysis of those changes, I dunno efc there would be much value in highlighting “-” in attribute names; highlighting it might cause some readers of the errata to assume that was the only change, which could make RFC ‘compliance’ worse if that was thought by some implementor to be the only substantive change to the grammar. Dynamic Delegation Discovery System. Better that rfv sorts of issues are documented.

A new MIME subtype ‘rpr’ can be used for repair stream. They don’t expect to support until the end ofif it doesn’t slip Houston, we have a problem.

Please find the last draft here: Retrieved from ” https: This page was last edited on 27 Septemberat GreenEyedAndy 9 If I try to parse the following sdp with help of Microsoft.

You can specify it in the gfc URI: It IS used in H. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Internet Control Message Protocol. Was this issue known before it became an RFC? Regards, Christian Dan Wing wrote: In reply to this tfc by David Singer.

Read Also:  RH135 PDF

Free forum by Nabble. Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Sure, but there’s still an issue here, or at least something needing clarification: Tuesday, June 05, 8: In this case, the text would seem to override the BNF, at least for X.

Rtc doesn’t understand this extension. IP over Avian Carriers. Network News Transfer Protocol.

On 5 Junat In reply to this post by Christian Groves If I have one stream which carries optional ‘repair’ data for another stream, and I want to send them on two separate multicast groups, or two separate streams to an RTSP client, how would I indicate that ‘this media stream’ is the repair data for ‘that media stream’ in SDP?

Trivial File Transfer Protocol.